arch & krach    






drawing at perceptual limits
mind the gap
collection 01
hotel interim
living metamorphosis
intermission
verrerie
traumhäuser des kollektivs?
dis/assemble
01/17
fermen-t-able
void
drushba
hotel national
forum 27
re-fulfilment centre
beyond demolition
gecekondu
idle water
was ist phase?
das wilde bauen
das ist doch gemein!
under the bridge
a (siegen) learning space
ivry’s pier
kandylakia
craftmanship campus
oberhammer
split
extraordinary standards
the collected building
fiktion
documentary of spaces
ko(r)nversion
embracing uncertainty
who cares?
zwischenhaus
concrete operations
triemli+128
house of desires
leipziger allerlei
parasite
zeitdokument
data center
how many rooms you need?
anonynums sculture
rooms of curiosities
neues kösk
on what a shodow falls
post auto mobile
random access memories
panorama
umbau um umbau
kosmos der dinge
superparkmarkt
archifiktion
herberge am grimselpass
kraft und licht
wandelhalle nord
reconstruct häring
upcyclinghof
hybrid
big mix
atelierhaus
revitalisierung einer werft
bauteildepot
sml
faust III
bauteil bahnhof
krach
arch
krach
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
krach
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
krach
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
krach
arch
arch
krach
arch
arch
arch
krach
arch
arch
krach
arch
arch
arch
krach
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
krach
arch
arch
arch
arch
krach
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
arch
max sandred
felix piel
jonathan burkard, christian sternhagen
andreas stanzel
cäcilia halbgewachs
fernando garrido carreras
killian paterson
aberle, klein, jakoby, grebe
meryl barthe, noémie perregaux-dielf
jonathan burkard
hannah ehre, marlene koßmann
léon bührer
gabriyel dari
olga cobuscean
pierre bomey
francis cheung
kimberly rahn,  toni bethäuser
joshua delissen
max bender
lucy wang
christian sternhagen
thilo preuß, clemens urban
kaya liffler, paula scheibke
matthias walbröl
getas, lambard, bomey
christian sternhagen
dardenne, leridee, correia, bomey kaya liffler, paula scheibke
anna schmitz
mathis bergmann, jonas könig
emily bardenz, finn gredel, kian matine leander lentner
marlene koßmann
dao le
jonathan burkard, marlene koßmann, pola machinska, felix schröder, liffler, scheibke,  sternhagen, kiparski, faixfinn marcelli
jonathan burkhard
lilly irmer, sophie kalwa
léopold parras
johannes zerfass
christian sternhagen, jonathan burkard yannic kohnen
maximilian gömann, paulina kirschke jakob naujack
hannah herrmann, cecelia vincent
lina etzkorn, lorena cirillo
vitus michel, levin arnold
lina etzkorn
lukas frenzel
eva beule, gerda callista, melissa enriquez, katharina glorius, franziska wilk, leander lentner, marlene koßmann
malte mittelstädt
jonah burgsteiner, klara schmidt
finn marcelli
marlene koßmann
felix piel
sebastian schaaf, ulrich kneisl, felix schröder, kaya liffler, paula scheibke
mathis bergmann
lina etzkorn
felix piel, fabian jäger
jonathan burkard, yannic kohnen
jonas könig, paul stockhausen
joshua delissen
jonathan burkard
dao le, christian sternhagen
mathis bergamnn, christian sternhagen christian sternhagen






about
mail
instagram
+
  





                     





drawing at perceptual limits
Since the beginnings of modernism, architects have often overlooked the mysterious and profound emotive influence space has on us. In the 18th and 19th centuries, scientific methods of drawing and simulating architecture were mathematically perfected (for example; a perspective drawing could be precisely constructed from a plan). In effect, these technological innovations reduced space to a measurable emptiness, and our conceptualization of space lost its premodern mysticism. (Pérez-Gómez and Pelletier, …the Perspective Hinge) In this thesis I use contemporary tools derived from these 18th and 19th century innovations to reveal that space is not a mathematical emptiness. Rather than considering space an empty void, I seek to rediscover its profound phenomenological effect.

My drawings, models, digital spaces, artifacts etc., are derived from the perception of digital cameras and sensors. I investigate how these machines perceive space from specific vantage points, and how they can be used to produce objects of thought. My work explores the limits of the data I can extract from them. This is done by translating this data into representational artifacts (drawings, models, digital spaces etc.) that hold onto qualities beyond description. In this process I reach a point where I am confronted by something utterly unfathomable, or where the initial qualities I am attempting to materialize are lost in translation. Ultimately, the phenomenological effect of space is difficult to fully grasp. This work manages to come into contact with perceptual qualities of various spaces from different angles, but never uncovers their mystery.

The introduction explains the term phenomenology in relation to my project and introduces the role of drawing in my work. The glossary introduces a list of key terms relevant throughout the book that developed in response to what my drawings uncovered. Part 1 & 2 introduce the initial work of the thesis where my method developed and began to uncover aspects of spatial phenomenology. These parts led to the development of the terms seenin the glossary. Part 3 delves into a specific site; the Église Notre Dame de Laeken, where I applied my method to explore its phenomenology through the surface of perception and shadow of occlusion. Parts 1-3 weave between my process of making that drives this thesis, and certain theoretical reflections that follow this process. 

Have a look at the complete thesis here.